<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Shakespeare&#8217;s Female Jesus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/</link>
	<description>Dude! A totally awesome blog about the Bible and other stuff!!!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-13766</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-13766</guid>
		<description>If you'd like to see my version of a female Jesus
this is my art website

http://kwcollages.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;d like to see my version of a female Jesus<br />
this is my art website</p>
<p><a href="http://kwcollages.com" rel="nofollow">http://kwcollages.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limbo</title>
		<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-3990</link>
		<dc:creator>limbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 06:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-3990</guid>
		<description>well im not taking any side here, but, if the generic man in the begining was niether male nor female, but was called man, he. Then when he took the "rib" from he(leaving a hole) and stuck it to a new generic man and called it woman, that would have the roles reversed. and adam is still trying to get back the rib to this day! man is woman and woman is man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well im not taking any side here, but, if the generic man in the begining was niether male nor female, but was called man, he. Then when he took the &#8220;rib&#8221; from he(leaving a hole) and stuck it to a new generic man and called it woman, that would have the roles reversed. and adam is still trying to get back the rib to this day! man is woman and woman is man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-3364</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-3364</guid>
		<description>I'd worship female Jesus.. of course. I'm certain that Jesus male never existed. 

Omar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d worship female Jesus.. of course. I&#8217;m certain that Jesus male never existed. </p>
<p>Omar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike-a BibleDude</title>
		<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike-a BibleDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>There is no proof. Jesus was clearly male. God's sexuality is complicated, though I should point out that in the minds of people in antiquity, Yahweh was male. However there were many many female deities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no proof. Jesus was clearly male. God&#8217;s sexuality is complicated, though I should point out that in the minds of people in antiquity, Yahweh was male. However there were many many female deities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Simpson</title>
		<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>I've heard the pyschic Sylvia Browne from the Montel show state this theory.

I wonder if anyone cares to worship a "FEMALE" Jesus.



Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard the pyschic Sylvia Browne from the Montel show state this theory.</p>
<p>I wonder if anyone cares to worship a &#8220;FEMALE&#8221; Jesus.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Simpson</title>
		<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>I have heard this once.

Where's the proof.  By the way, I had mentioned this to a friend of mine and "we almost fought".

Are there anyother books that points to this.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard this once.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the proof.  By the way, I had mentioned this to a friend of mine and &#8220;we almost fought&#8221;.</p>
<p>Are there anyother books that points to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bibledudes.com/blog/2005/07/29/bill-shakespeares-female-jesus/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Sadly(?) it seems this latest example of religious cash cows seems to be out of print!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly(?) it seems this latest example of religious cash cows seems to be out of print!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
